No. 18-8722
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-review due-process federal-courts federal-law habeas-corpus jurisdictional-ruling mandamus prisoner-rights standing
Latest Conference:
2019-06-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
THE PLURAL WAS AMENDED FOR 28 U.S.C. § 1915 TO IMPOSE NEW FELUC PROLEDUREE OJ ARCEONER'E DEEIRONG TD APAEAR LIFAJON CERTAIN PROCECDLNCE ULA PRISONER EEEKONG TO BROG A CNIL ACTSOU OR AAPCAL AJUOGMOUT INA CIVELACTION "CLEARLY DEMONETRATING "ACON. ETITUTSOUAL REGHTVEOLATEONE OF 2BU.EC, EIQIS LQ UNDER DMMDUET DANCER OFSEROUE
THDI3HE DUJURY OF BONDING DRECEDEUT OF WAREV.LOUEEIANA DEPARTMENTOFCORRECTONE 866 F.3d 263(5MMCIR.2OM(CERT.REVEEW DENIED FEBRUARYAL 2OI8
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eighth Circuit's refusal to allow the petitioner to file a successive habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b) was proper
Docket Entries
2019-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.
2019-02-13
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Lee Sheppard
Curtis Lee Sheppard Jr. — Petitioner