No. 18-8718
Anthony C. Barrett v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act circuit-split collateral-review habeas-corpus johnson-v-united-states retroactivity sentencing sentencing-enhancement void-for-vagueness
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a second or successive habeas petitioner asserting that his sentence is invalid under Johnson II must show that the sentencing court relied exclusively on the ACCA's residual clause when the sentencing record is silent on the issue.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a second or successive habeas petitioner asserting that his sentence is invalid under Johnson II must show that the sentencing court relied exclusively on the ACCA's residual clause when the sentencing record is silent on the issue
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-04-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 8, 2019)
Attorneys
Anthony C. Barrett
Barbara Anne Smith — Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent