PetitioneRs' 4th, 5th, 6th And 13th Constitutional Rights Violated by BRidgepoRt, CT OGGol. When he Refosed to do whaAt the PetitioNeR sAid t do. He was told to do important things many time by the Pelitioner thAt wAs impoRtANt to do foe the eUidentAry heaniNg, Some ofit wAs evidence thAt wAs Neven Requested oR obtAined by the U.S. of AmeniCA ; goveRment" but, Petitioner Asted Counsel to Request it All evidence the Petitioner asked him to brinyfonwnad. Why didn't counsel ever Reguest the evideNce from veRizoN wiReless he was told to do ? Petitionen Asked About to his heaRing, "Appendix E". why did CouNsel NeveR file a 18 U.S.C.S. Sa703(6) with yahoo. Com. It should of been filed under The Stored Commiunicatiow Act A whole week befone the F.B.I. Stanted eNtRapment and punsveing of AinwoCENt victim the Petitioner " on 6-16-2010,DNd 6-23-2010, y00 will see iN A+ that point. Councel violated the Petitioner's Rights not only of the J.S. CoNstifioNAl Rigntto Due PRocess, but mAny othen Rights.

Whether the petitioner's 5th, 6th, 8th, and 13th Amendment constitutional rights were violated by the United States government and the petitioner's counsel