No. 18-8677
Patrick Lloyd v. United States
IFP
Tags: circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process guilty-plea harmless-error plea-bargaining rule-11 standing united-states-v-dominguez-benitez
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Dominguez BenItez's harmless error rule applies to Rule 11(b)(1)(G)'s requirement that before a guilty plea can be accepted the district court must ensure that the defendant understands the nature of the charges against him?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Dominguez Benitez's harmless error rule applies to Rule 11(b)(1)(G)'s requirement that before a guilty plea can be accepted the district court must ensure that the defendant understands the nature of the charges against him?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-08
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-05-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 8, 2019.
2019-05-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 3, 2019 to July 8, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-04-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 3, 2019.
2019-04-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 2, 2019 to June 3, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 2, 2019)
Attorneys
Patrick Lloyd
Steven Y. Yurowitz — Newman & Greenberg, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent