Whether the court of appeal's decision below, which effectively shifted the burden of proof onto Petitioner, a non-moving party at the summary judgment stage, without adequate discovery, is contrary to established precedent.

Whether the inequitable nature of the erroneous decision, as well as its adverse effect on tenants in the State of Louisiana and nationwide, who rely on protection from slum landlords, merits this Court's review.

Whether the court of appeal's decision below, which effectively shifted the burden of proof onto Petitioner, a non-moving party at the summary judgment stage, without adequate discovery, is contrary to established precedent