No. 18-8673
Jamael Stubbs v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 133 S.Ct. 2151 (2013) 6th-amendment alleyne-precedent alleyne-v-united-states constructive-amendment due-process ineffective-assistance sentencing sentencing-challenge sixth-amendment trial-counsel
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to preserve either a sentencing challenge or a constructive amendment claim under Alleyne v. United States, 133 S.Ct. 2151 (2013).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance
Docket Entries
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-03-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 2, 2019)
Attorneys
Jamael Stubbs
Jennifer Philpott Wilson — Philpott Wilson LLP, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent