Whether it is a question of Law for the Supreme Court of the United States to determine the conduct complained of?

Whether the Petitioner have a Constitutional right to a fair trial?

Whether there was a denial of due process because the evidence was unconstitutionally insufficient to convict?

Whether the verdict should be set aside because it was contrary to the weight of evidence?

Whether there was a denial of due process to the Petitioner because the trial did not comport with fundamental fairness because of the improper actions of Police and Prosecutor?

Whether the materiality of false testimony is a question of Law? for the Supreme Court of the United States to decide

Whether the State bears the burden of proving voluntary consent when it obtains consent known as knock and talk?

Whether the State or Defense Attorney have the burden to declare a witness unavailable?

Whether the Petitioner have a Constitutional right to confront witnesses against him?

Whether the failure of the trial court to advise the Petitioner of his CrR 35 (b) rights at the suppression hearing constitute reversible error?

What constitute or consider a seizure?

If a person or suspect is 'seized' is he consider to be in custody' for Miranda purposes?

Whether in Washington State according to CrRLJ 3.1 "the phase taken into 'custody has been replaced with has been 'arrested'?

For the purpose of Miranda V Arizona, 348 US 436 (1966), is the Police required to advise a person or suspect of his or her Miranda rights if he or she is in Police custody?

Whether CrR 3.1 (b)(1) is equivalent to that of CrRLJ 3.1 (b)(1), that rule based on the right to Counsel before the Petitioner has a Sixth Amendment right to Counsel?

Whether the right to a Lawyer shall accures as soon as feasible 'after the person or suspect is taken into custody?

Whether the Police must comply with Ferrier warning prior to entering a person or suspect residence to effect an arrest or search?

What constitute a Warrantless Search or Seizure?

Whether a person or suspect have a Constitutional right to be confronted with evidence used against him including Audio and Video recordings?

Whether a person or suspect have a Constitutional right to Compulsory Process?

Whether the conduct complained of is a question of law