No. 18-8626
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: arrest constitutional-rights criminal-procedure defense-counsel due-process federal-criminal-procedure initial-appearance magistrate-judge plea-bargaining plea-hearing right-to-counsel
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Was Petitioner Aaron Murray Entiteled to an initial apperanc.e. before a United States Magistrate Judge under Fed. R. Criminal P Rule 5?
How was Petitioner Aaron Murrays first apperance in court a plea hearing?
III. How did Petitioner Aaron Murray recieve attorney Paul Laufman as defense counsel?
IV. How is it possible that Petitioner Aaron Murray signed a plea deal before he was formally arrested, charged, or informed of the charges and advised his constitutional rights in open court?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Petitioner Aaron Murray Entitled to an initial appearance before a United States Magistrate Judge under Fed. R. Criminal P Rule 5?
Docket Entries
2019-08-05
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-05-24
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2019)
2019-02-23
Application (18A860) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until April 8, 2019.
2019-01-16
Application (18A860) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 5, 2019 to April 6, 2019, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Aaron Murray
Aaron Murray — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent