No. 18-8620
Joel M. Hicklin v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel evidentiary-hearing habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Virginia Supreme Court erred for Not finding the Petitioner's failure to investigate Showing Comprehensive?
2. Whether the effective assistance of counsel is requisite to a fair trial and the "right to defend" personal?
3. Whether the Supreme Court erred for not holding a plenary hearing for additional inquiry into the car in contrast to the "Poor photos" of Ms. Harkless' car?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Virginia Supreme Court erred in finding the petitioner's failure to investigate
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-15
Waiver of right of respondent Harold Clarke to respond filed.
2018-06-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2019)
2018-05-17
Application (17A1274) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until June 28, 2018.
2018-04-10
Application (17A1274) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 29, 2018 to June 28, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Harold Clarke
Toby Jay Heytens — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Joel Hicklin
Joel M. Hicklin — Petitioner