23 Year Long "Circuit split" is making 9Jxgj) Unconstitutional to my case.)

The 23 Live Rounds of Ammunition Was Manufactured An Assembled In The (Same state) were defendant was Arrested At o

The Supreme court Set up The "minimal nexus test" to find defendants Violat he Interstate Commerce element of the offense o If Look to y case), the "minimal ness test" is "no proven" see Scarborough V. United states 431 U.s.563,575/977)

"Circuit split" Chrout is sil Holding to the facts in o osby. 6045/8 8th

About "NO A.T.f Specialist oR Ammunition Specialist" Never testified to the fact's In mosby based on Interstate Commerce

In circuit Also Sth circuit distinguished the Mosby case, to it's facts. With the 6th circuit Agreeing with the Sth circuit Chamber's case o

If I wAs In Any other "Circuit court" with this Case, would their even be federal Jurisdiction over my Case o

Whether the 'terminal ballistics test' used to determine the dangerousness of ammunition is properly applied in this case