1. In conflict with decisions of this Court and the
Third Circuit, does the First Amendment permit Cal-ifornia to impose tort liability for truthfully promoting
a lawful product that it finds to be hazardous in some
uses?

2. Doe s the Due Process Clause allow a state to
impose retroactive and grossly disproportionate pub-lic nuisance liability to inspect and abate millions of residences based on decades -old promotions without
evidence that consumers relied on those promotions or that petitioner 's lead paint is in any residence?

Whether the First Amendment permits imposing tort liability for truthfully promoting a lawful product later deemed hazardous