Did the utah appellate Caurt err in holding that
the erroneous jury instruetion, which impermissibly
shifted the biurden of proof onto Petitioner/Defendant
Ramos to prove imperfect self-defense beyond a
reasonable doutt, was not prejudicial?

Did the utah appellate court err in holding that
trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to
object to improperly elicited testimony that was
irrelevant and prejudictal?

Did the Utah appellate court err in holding that the erroneous jury instruction, which impermissibly shifted the burden of proof onto Petitioner/Defendant Romo to prove imperfect self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt, was not prejudicial?