1. WHEN A PETITIONER CHALLENGES HIS EXTRADITION, ARE THE DEFENDANT-RESPONDENTS TOTALLY EXEMPT FROM LIABILITY, ALTHOUGH THEY KNEW OF THE PENDING HABEAS CORPUS CHALLENGE ?

2. IS THE PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT APPLICABLE TO A PLAINTIFF WITH SOLELY PROCEDURAL VIOLATIONS; AND NOT CONDITIONS & CONFINEMENT ?

3. IS A HABEAS CORPUS PETITION CHALLENGING THE PLAINTIFF'S EXTRADITION MOOT BECAUSE PLAINTIFF WAS EXTRADITED BEFORE HIS CHANCE TO CHALLENGE HIS EXTRADITION ?

4. HOW CAN PLAINTIFF'S PURELY PROCEDURAL CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION BE RECONCILED, WHEN CHALLENGING HIS EXTRADITION IS NO LONGER AVAILABLE DUE TO HIS ILLEGAL REMOVAL FROM THE ASYLUM STATE, WAS THE PURELY PROCEDURAL CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION ?

5. PLAINTIFF'S EFFORTS TO OBTAIN A COPY OF THE ASYLUM STATE'S GOVERNOR WARRANT HAVE BEEN FUTILE, BECAUSE THE WARRANT NEVER EXISTED IN THE FIRST PLACE. HOW DOES THIS FACT MEASURE AGAINST DEFENDANTS' CONTENTION OF A CONSTITUTIONALLY LEGAL EXTRADITION ?

When a petitioner challenges his extradition, are the defendant-responsible-for-the-extradition-totally-exempt-from-liability, although they knew of the pending-habeas-corpus-challenge?