No. 18-8586
Roderick Black v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-licensing constitutional-law constitutional-violation criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-counsel ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel sixth-amendment standing
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
IN LIGHT OF HIS TRIAL ATTORNEY NOT BEING DULY LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW IN VIOLATION OF HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS UNDER THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's sentence should be vacated in light of his trial attorney not being duly licensed to practice law in violation of his Sixth Amendment rights under the Federal Constitution?
Docket Entries
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2019)
Attorneys
Roderick Black
Roderick Black — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent