Whether Florida Supreme Court Judgments Conflicts with the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals Post-trial Exculpatory Findings due Process violation by Premises of Brady 514 U.S. 419 (1995); Giglio v. U.S. 405 U.S. 150 (1972)?

Whether Florida Supreme Court Judgements Conflicts with the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals Post-trial Exculpatory Findings that governs respondent duty to disclose exculpatory Brady Material as set Forth in Strickler v. Greene, 527 U.S. 263, 283 (1999); Imbler v. Pachtman 424 U.S. 409 (1970)?

Whether Florida Supreme Court judgment conflicts with established Federal law that governs effective trial and Appellate Counsel Sixth Amendment constitutional duty as set Forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387 (1985); Maples v. Thomas, 132 S.Ct. 912 (2012); Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S.Ct. 1309 (2012)?

Whether Florida Supreme Court entered Mistrial Canted without A competency Amendment Double Jeopardy Proscribes, that Prohibited A retrial by this court case law Calhoun, U.S. v. Jorn, 400 U.S. 474 (1971); Evans v. Michigan, 133 S.Ct. 1069 (2013)?

Whether Florida Supreme Court Failure to address record Fact Petitioner was terminated From Self-representation without a competency screening to abide discharge conflicts with Sixth Amendment constitutional right as established in Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 821 (1975); Meachle v. Wiggins, 465 U.S. 168, 124 (1984)?

Whether Florida Supreme Court imposition of Sanctions has been enforced under fraudulent Pretense to cover up alleged conviction, and to prohibit his right to Access to courts to have claims heard on merits. That conflicts with U.S.C.A. 1st, 11th, In re McDonald, 489 U.S. 180, 184 (1989); Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 828 (1977)?

Habeas corpus and subjects the petitioner to A Fundamental miscarriage of justice that contrast with Harris v. Nelson, 89 S.Ct. 1082 (1969); U.S.C.A. Article 1?

On Sanctions conflicts with the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals Post-trial Exculpatory Findings, that No Competency hearing was held violates Petitioner right as a citizen to enjoy due Process of Law under the U.S.C.A. 6th, 14th, Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)?

Whether Florida Supreme Court Judgment on Sanctions violates Petitioner Sixth Amendment right to confronting admissible hearsay based upon accusation of a testimonial Crawford Report under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004)?

On Sanctions conflicts with the declare petitioner incompetent or competent for September 3

Whether the Florida Supreme Court erred in upholding sanctions against the petitioner that violated his due process rights under the 14th Amendment