No. 18-8564
Kelvin Wayne Heath v. Melinda K. Braman, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: automatic-reversal compulsory-process confrontation-clause constitutional-rights due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel exculpatory-evidence fair-trial ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prosecutorial-misconduct uniform-act-on-production-of-out-of-state-witnesse witness-tampering
Latest Conference:
2019-05-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did trial court abuse discretion by allowing text messages that's erased?
Was Trial Counsel ineffective?
Was 6th Amendment violated specifically Confrontation Clause?
Did Trial court abuse discretion For Failing to hold hearing on?
Was Bill of Rights violated?
Am I entitled to Constitutional Privilege, Liberty, and Articles?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court erred in convicting the petitioner despite the lack of testimony from a key witness and the prosecutor's misconduct in handling the witness's unavailability
Docket Entries
2019-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-03
Waiver of right of respondent Melinda K. Braman, Warden to respond filed.
2018-04-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Kelvin Wayne Heath
Kelvin W. Heath — Petitioner
Melinda K. Braman, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent