No. 18-8549

Keith D. Goodman v. I. D. Hamilton, Warden

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure district-court due-process facial-unconstitutionality fourth-circuit habeas habeas-corpus second-or-successive second-successive-petition standing statutory-interpretation unconstitutional-statute
Latest Conference: 2019-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)

In 2013, The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals declared Va. Code § 18.2-361(A), a state criminal statute under which Petitioner remains convicted, sentenced, and imprisoned, to be facially unconstitutional. The question presented is:

1.) whether a § 2254 (habeas) claim of a conviction under that facially unconstitutional statute is, by itself, able and sufficient to overcome a statutory second or successive' determination by the district court?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a § 2254 (habeas) claim of a conviction under a facially unconstitutional statute is sufficient to overcome a statutory 'second or successive' determination by the district court

Docket Entries

2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-10
Waiver of right of respondent I. D. Hamilton to respond filed.
2018-06-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 25, 2019)

Attorneys

I. D. Hamilton
Toby Jay HeytensOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Keith D. Goodman
Keith D. Goodman — Petitioner