No. 18-853
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Postal Regulatory Commission
Tags: administrative-law agency-deference agency-discretion chevron-deference cost-attribution institutional-costs package-delivery postal-accountability-and-enhancement-act postal-regulatory-commission postal-service statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration Antitrust JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration Antitrust JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-05-16
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Should this Court reconsider the doctrine of Chevron deference?
2. Should this Court hold that Chevron deference does not apply to an agency's unexplained statutory interpretations?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should this Court reconsider the doctrine of Chevron deference?
Docket Entries
2019-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-05-08
Rescheduled.
2019-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-22
Reply of petitioner United Parcel Service, Inc. filed.
2019-04-05
Brief of intervenor respondents Amazon.com Services, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
2019-04-05
Brief of respondent Postal Regulatory Commission in opposition filed.
2019-02-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 5, 2019, for all respondents.
2019-02-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 6, 2019 to April 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-02-04
Brief amici curiae of States of Texas, et al. filed.
2019-01-31
Brief amicus curiae of Landmark Legal Foundation filed.
2019-01-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 6, 2019, for all respondents.
2019-01-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 4, 2019 to March 6, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-01-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 6, 2019, for all respondents.
2019-01-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 4, 2019 to March 6, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-12-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 4, 2019)
2018-10-15
Application (18A398) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 25, 2018 to December 24, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.
2018-10-15
Application (18A398) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 24, 2018.
Attorneys
Amazon.com Services, Inc.
Neal Kumar Katyal — Hogan Lovells US LLP, Respondent
Landmark Legal Foundation
Postal Regulatory Commission
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
THE STATES OF TEXAS, ALABAMA, ARIZONA, ARKANSAS, KANSAS, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEBRASKA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, AND UTAH
United Parcel Service, Inc.