No. 18-8519
Frederick H. Banks v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process error-coram-nobis foreign-intelligence-surveillance-act jurisdiction revocation-proceeding standing
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Appeal Court and District Court err in denying the Petition for A writ of Error Coram vobis und Audita Querela and Affirming That denial?
Did the District Court and Appeal court lack subject matter jurisdiction over the udyg crm cat wen te coe w not braugt i the name America' rather than "United States"?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the appeals court and/or district court err in denying the petition for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate the criminal conviction and affirming that denial?
Docket Entries
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Frederick H. Banks
Frederick H. Banks — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent