No. 18-8512
DaRen Kareem Gadsden v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process judicial-integrity judicial-proceedings multiplicitous-sentence plain-error remand rosales-mireles-standard sentencing sentencing-review substantial-rights
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
In light of Rosales-Mireles v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 1897, 201 L. Ed. 2d 376 (2018), which, states, "[{fJailure to correct plain error that affected a defendant substantial right would seriously affect the fairness, integrity, and public reputation of judicial proceedings" should this case be remanded back to the district court for resentencing.
Whether a multiplicitous sentence issue can be raised at any time.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a multiplicitous sentence issue can be raised at any time
Docket Entries
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Daren Kareem Gadsden
DaRen Kareem Gadsden — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent