No. 18-8510
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-counsel criminal-procedure direct-appeal due-process federal-law ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel retroactivity right-to-be-present right-to-presence state-law trial-counsel weaver-retroactivity weaver-v-massachusetts
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. DOES THE FEDERAL' L'AW OF WEAVER V. MASSACHUSETTS, 137 S.Ct. 1899 (2017);
HAVE RETROACTIVE APPLICATION IN THE STATE OF MARYL'AND?
2. DOES A TRIAL! COUNSEL! RENDER INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL!, WHEN HE
VIOLATES HIS CL'IENT'S FEDERAL' AND STATE L'AW RIGHT, TO BE PRESENT AT
EVERY STAGE OF TRIAL?
3. DOES AN APPELLATE COUNSEL! RENDER INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL!, WHEN
HE FAIL'S TO RAISE ON DIRECT APPEAL' THE VIOL'ATION OF HIS CLIENT'S FEDERAL!
AND STATE L'AW RIGHT, TO BE PRESENT AT EVERY STAGE OF TRIAL!?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the federal law of Weaver v. Massachusetts, 137 S.Ct. 1899 (2017) have retroactive application in the state of Maryland?
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-10
Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
2019-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Maryland
Carrie J. Williams — Respondent
Travis Thaniel
Travis Thaniel — Petitioner