No. 18-8504
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process imprisonment procedural-reasonableness reasonableness sentencing sentencing-factors sentencing-guidelines supervised-release
Latest Conference:
2019-04-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, on remand, imposition of the same twenty-five year term of imprisonment and maximum ter superviselease was bot procurally n ubstantively rable.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the imposition of the same twenty-five year term of imprisonment and maximum term of supervised release was both procedurally and substantively unreasonable
Docket Entries
2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-03-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-03-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2019)
Attorneys
John Whaley
James Matthew Branden — Law Office of James M. Branden, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent