No. 18-8501
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law deportation-consequences guilty-plea immigrant-rights immigration ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel lee-v-united-states prejudice
Latest Conference:
2019-04-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Does an analysis of prejudice in the context of ineffective assistance of counsel involving the guilty plea of an immigrant result in a unreasonable application of Lee v. United States, 137 S.Ct. 1958 (2017) where no consideration is given as to how an attorney's misadvice concerning the deportation consequences affected the decision to plead guilty?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does an analysis of prejudice in the context of ineffective assistance of counsel involving the guilty plea of an immigrant result in an unreasonable application of Lee v. United States,137 S.Ct. 1958 (2017) where no consideration is given as to how an attorney's misadvice concerning the deportation consequences affected the decision to plead guilty?
Docket Entries
2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-03-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Mohammed Bah
Mohammed Bah — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent