No. 18-8498
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process guideline-range mental-health sentencing sentencing-guidelines sentencing-review substantive-reasonableness supervised-release
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-04-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is a supervised release revocation sentence of a length more than double the top of the advisory Guideline range substantively unreasonable if the district court imposes it without addressing extensive evidence of the impact of the defendant's serious mental health conditions?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a supervised release revocation sentence of a length more than double the top of the advisory Guideline range substantively unreasonable if the district court imposes it without addressing extensive evidence of the impact of the defendant's serious mental health conditions?
Docket Entries
2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-03-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-03-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 19, 2019)
Attorneys
Oryan Yazzie
Margaret Ann Katze — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent