No. 18-8494
Alberto Sostre-Cintron v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-USC-371 18-usc-641 conspiracy conspiracy-18-usc-371 criminal-conspiracy criminal-law district-court-proceedings morissette-standard morissette-v-united-states parties-to-the-proceedings statutory-provisions sufficiency-of-evidence theft-of-government-property theft-of-government-property-18-usc-641
Latest Conference:
2019-04-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether there was sufficient evidence to support Alberto Sostre-Cintron's conviction of conspiracy pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §371.
Whether there was sufficient evidence to support the Petitioner's conviction of theft of government property pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §641, Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 269 n. 28, 72 S. Ct. 240, 253, 96 L. Ed. 288 (1952)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there was sufficient evidence to support Alberto Sostre-Cintron's conviction of conspiracy pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §371
Docket Entries
2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-03-28
Waiver of right of respondent USA to respond filed.
2019-03-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Alberto Sostre-Cintron
Michael Hasse — Hasse & Associates, Petitioner
USA
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent