No. 18-8486
Joel Marvin Munt v. Eddie Miles, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights department-of-corrections due-process filing-delay frivolousness habeas-corpus judicial-error mootness procedural-review standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Was it error to not consider the DOC's role in filing delays when ruling Writ of Habeas corpus moot?
Did Court error by holding his petition was moot?
Did Court error in equating mootness with frivolousness in this case?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was it error to not consider the DOC's role in filing delays when ruling Writ. of Habeas corpus moot?
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-09
Waiver of right of respondent Eddie Miles to respond filed.
2019-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Eddie Miles
Kelly Susan Kemp — Minnesota Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Joel M. Munt
Joel M. Munt — Petitioner