No. 18-8467

Abukar Osman Beyle v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection standing statutory-interpretation takings
Latest Conference: 2019-04-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the Court Of Appeals create a Procedural Error, when it determined Petitioner, Abukar 0. Beyle, in a "Capitol Murder Case", did not make a claim that, "dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and "that motion states a debatable claim of Constitutional Right", ruling after it determined they first independently reviewed the record, reviewing the facts, and legal contentions, and materials, before denying the COA request? In attempting to address wether or not a conflict dealing with a Interpreter, in trial for his life, properly interpreting questions and answers the interpreter deemed proper rather than the correct answers ), for reasons that he (the Interpreter not the Defendant was a member of the tribe standing trial, Was this decision in error because it relied on merits analysis, that was not coextensive, with the COA Process? ( Violating the Buck v. Davis, analysis )

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation of the relevant statutory and constitutional provisions

Docket Entries

2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-03-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 18, 2019)

Attorneys

Abukar Osman Beyle
Abukar O. Beyle — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent