Does the Certificate of Appealability process weaken the efficacy of the Writ, either to the point of working a Suspension of the Writ or of making §2255 on inadequate and ineffective substitute for habeas corpus?

As the burden to show that a Certificate of Appealability should issue is on the Petitioner, must an opportunity to brief the request be given?

Must a petitioner mechanically cite The Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668(1984), standard in every ground to obtain review of his claim?

Is the right to a Speedy Trial a strategic decision, which Counsel may make without consulting his client, or over his objection under McCoy v Louisiana, 200 L Ed 2d 821 (2018), or must the client consent to the waiver?

Should the aggregation principle of Gonzales v Raich, 545 US 1 (2005), be revisited in light of later cases of this Court, and to provide meaningful limits on Congress Commerce Clause powers?

Does the Certificate of Appealability process weaken the efficacy of the Writ, either to the point of working a Suspension of the Writ or of making §2255 on inadequate and ineffective substitute for habeas corpus?