Whether the erroneously admitted evidence reviewing sufficiently material to provide the basis for conviction or to remove a reasonable doubt that would have existed on the record without it. In short it must have been "crucial critical, highly significant" purpose of accomplishing some concerted action was plan or design, that denied Truesdole fundamentally fair and unbiased trial exculpatory evidence.

Whether deliberately Withholding: existence exculpatory evidence, Fabricating the original Pinellas County Florida Sheriff's office Jail Visitation Video-Tapes, that splice or altered evidence, knowingly Fabricated or conspiracy at trial, by the state and defense attorneys, reasonable likelihood exists that the False evidence would have affected the decision of the verdict, is an erred so pervasive as to have denied Truesdole a Fundamentally fair, unbiased trial. The erroneously admitted reviewed objectively in light of the entire record before He provide the basis for conviction or to remove a reasonable doubt that would have existed on the record if the entire videotapes was played and not splice, altered or docket.

WHETHER THE REGISTER OF ACTION LOSE NO.0SZ50ORCF AND TAUPSDO/O'S "NOTICE OF INTENT TO SVETWAIUER OF SOUEREIGN ImmunITY's" Pursuant to Florida statute 768 in accordance to I section 42 uses & 1983I filed In The circuit court of the Sixth Judicial circuit, In And For Pinellas County, Florida CTvial court) never "detained or vesponse too," by the under the "eguitable tolling" principle.

Whether Florida Department of Corrections Prison OFficials have "DFNKED" Truesdule a Fundamentally rights under the constitution of the united states cad Florida. The united the united states Appeal Court, "Fraudulent Claim of Dismissol" Truesdole (June S, 2o18 DE H:1 Demand For A Clerk's OUder"RETUNED UNFILED" DecemBer18, 31 W Denieding Truesdole his Due Process of Fquul Prot vight to ron "ESTABLESHENG A RECORDS".

Whether a state trial court's brief in601107 and 0bbreviated review of evidence velevant to a Botson thollenge satisfies its obligation under step three of the Botson inguiry to consider "all of the civcumstances thot beer upon the issue of racial animosity. Snyder v. Louisiana, ss2 U.5. 472,478 (2008).

Whether the erroneously admitted evidence reviewed objectively in light of the entire record before the jury was sufficiently material to provide the basis for conviction or to remove a reasonable doubt that would have existed on the record without it