No. 18-8449

Juan Bustos-Chavez v. Matthew Hansen, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actual-innocence alibi alibi-evidence due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel merits-review murray-v-carrier procedural-review
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-04-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the actual innocence exception established by Murray
v. Carrier, applies to alibi evidence;

II. Whether, based on the alibi evidence submitted in the pro se
habeas application, Mr. Bustos-chavez was entitled to a review
of the merits of his habeas claims in both the federal district and
appellate courts.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the actual innocence exception established by Murray v. Carrier applies to alibi evidence

Docket Entries

2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-03-28
Waiver of right of respondent Matthew Hansen, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
2019-03-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 18, 2019)

Attorneys

Juan Bustos-Chavez
Juan Bustos-Chavez — Petitioner
Matthew Hansen, Warden, et al.
L. Andrew CooperOffice of the Colorado Attorney General, Respondent