No. 18-8448
Edward Bishop v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment criminal-procedure digital-evidence digital-files dna-evidence evidence fourth-amendment particularity-requirement probable-cause search-warrant
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
1.Does a search warrant which described the place to be searched and the things to be seized as "any evidence (including, all photos, videos, and/or other digital files, including, removable memory cards) of suspect identity, motive, scheme/plan along with DNA evidence of the crime of Criminal Recklessness with a deadly weapon which is hidden or secreted [in the cell phone or] related to the offense of Dealing illegal drugs" fail the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a search warrant which described the place to be searched and the things to be seized fail the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment?
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2019)
Attorneys
Edward Bishop
William J Stevens — William J Stevens, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent