should not the United States District Court of Clorado have granted the
Petitiuner counsel after he informed them that he had an ongoing complaint
against his retained counel, prior to her filing his habeas Corpus w/o
Conferrirg with him, and her doing so on the deadline date fwhich happened to
be the same date that the supreme court denied the writ of certoriari, and
then the court offers counsel the apportunty to withdraw, thus leaving
Petitioner ufo representation in such a pivotal and potentially dtrimentalhearrg
Opening brief and fetition for a rehearing?

Should the loth circuit Court of appeauls have ignored Federal Rules of
Evidere that wer rolate, pecifcay, utee b)?

Should the United States District Court of Colorado have granted the Petitioner Counsel after he informed them that he had an ongoing Complaint against his retained counsel prior to her filing his habeas Corpus, and her doing so on the deadline date, and then the Court grants Counsel the opportunity to withdraw, thus leaving Petitioner without representation in such a pivotal and potentially determinative hearing?