No. 18-8412

Lamar Perryman v. Georgia, et al.

Lower Court: Georgia
Docketed: 2019-03-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 11th-amendment cherokee-nation-v-georgia civil-rights constitutional-interpretation eleventh-amendment johnson-v-mcintosh native-american-rights non-intercourse-act sovereign-immunity treaty-law worcester-v-georgia
Latest Conference: 2019-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Does Title 25 U. S. C. Section 177 (Non-Intercourse Act) and this Court's decisions in Johnson v. MIntosh, Cherokee Nation v. Georgia and Worcestor V. Georgia abrogate Georgia's Sovereign Immunity and Eleventh Amendment Immunity when Georgia's actions against the petitioners were taken in violation of the laws and treaties of the United States of America?

2. Does the actions of Georgia violate both the Constitution of the State of Georgia and the U. S. Constitution in regards to the petitioners claims?

3. Can Georgia extend it's Sovereign Immunity and Eleventh Amendment Immunity to it's Counties where the Counties do not normally possess such immunities against the petitioners claims?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does Title 25 U.S.C. Section 177 (Non-Intercourse Act) and this Court's decisions abrogate Georgia's sovereign immunity and Eleventh Amendment immunity?

Docket Entries

2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-03-18
Waiver of right of respondent Georgia to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-02-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Georgia
Andrew Alan Pinson — Office of the Georgia Attorney General, Respondent
Lamar Perryman
Lamar Perryman — Petitioner