DOES STRICKLAND v. WASHINGTON, 466 US 668, 80 L Ed Qd 674, 104 S Ct 2052 REQUIRE THE GOVERNMENT'S EVIDENCE TO BE WEAK TO FIND A CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY INEFFECTIVE UNDER THE SIXTH AMENDMENT

DOES REASONABLENESS OF A. COUNSEL'S CONDUCT ALSO APPLY TO THE COUNSEL'S CONDUCT DURING PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER STRICKLAND v. WASHINGTON, 466 US 668, 80 L Ed 2d 674, 104 5 Ct 2052 ?

DOES A CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY VIOLATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED UNDER THE DUE PROCESS AND CONFRONTATIONAL 'CLAUSES, WHEN THE ATTORNEY SUPPRESSES AND EXCLUDES READILY AVAILABLE FAVORABLE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE FOR ONLY THE GOVERNMENT TO GAIN ADVANTAGE IN THE PROCEEDINGS 7

DOES ABSENCE OF THE ACCUSED'S DNA ON THE SEXUAL ASSAULT KIT, AND NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE OF OTHER FORENSIC EVIDENCE SHOWS IT WAS FLAWED, PRESENTS AN ACTUAL. INNOCENCE UNDER THE HOLDING OF HOUSE v. BELL, 547 US 518, 126 5 Ct 2064, 165 L Ed 2d 1, 2006 US LEXIS 4675

Does Strickland v. Washington require the government's evidence to be weak to find a criminal defense attorney ineffective under the Sixth Amendment?