No. 18-8383

Jeremy C. Southgate v. United States, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: antitrust antitrust-conspiracy business-damage civil-procedure civil-rights conspiracy court-procedure inherent-authority legal-representation racketeering standing trademark trademark-property
Key Terms:
Antitrust DueProcess Trademark JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)

First,
Is there arguable merit to the claim that Respondents engaged in an unlawful antitrust and/or racketeering conspiracy, intending by a pattern of frauds to obtain Petitioner's registered trademark property and damage the Petitioner's business?

Second,
Under the circumstances, have the courts erred in failing to request counsel to represent the Petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); or, shall this Supreme Court, pursuant to this Court's inherent authority in equity, now appoint counsel for the Petitioner?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is there arguable merit to the claim that Respondents engaged in an unlawful antitrust-conspiracy, racketeering-conspiracy, trademark-property, business

Docket Entries

2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-04-05
Waiver of right of respondent Spotify AB to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-04-05
Waiver of right of respondent The Clinton Foundation to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-04-02
Waiver of right of respondent National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences, Inc. to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-03-25
Waiver of right of respondent IAC/Interactivecorp to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-03-21
Waiver of right of respondent Alphabet, Inc. (sued as Alphabet, Inc., a/ka Google) to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-03-20
Waiver of right of respondents Lyor Cohen; Theory Entertainment LLC; Warner Music Group Corp.; and Time Warner Inc. to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-03-19
Waiver of right of respondent Starbucks Corporation to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-03-15
Waiver of right of respondent International Business Machines Corporation to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-03-15
Waiver of right of respondent Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 11, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences
Christopher Tayback — Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Respondent
Alphabet, Inc. (sued as Alphabet, Inc., a/ka Google)
Wendy C. McGraw — Hunton Andrews Kurth, LLP, Respondent
IAC/Interactivecorp
Craig Crandall Reilly — Law Office of Craig C. Reilly, Respondent
International Business Machines Corporation
Sean Marotta — Hogan Lovells US LLP, Respondent
Jeremy C. Southgate
Jeremy C. Southgate — Petitioner
Lyor Cohen; Theory Entertainment LLC; Warner Music Group Corp.; and Time Warner Inc.
Tom J. Ferber — Pryor Cashman LLP, Respondent
National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences, Inc.
Sandra A. Crawshaw-Sparks — Proskauer Rose, LLP, Respondent
Spotify AB
Daniel Peter Reing — Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Respondent
Starbucks Corporation
Joseph S. Cianfrani — Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, Respondent
The Clinton Foundation
Kevin A. Chambers — Latham & Watkins, LLP, Respondent
United States, et al.
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent