No. 18-8378
Garron T. Briggs v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: acquittal constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process guilty-plea habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-proceeding plea-bargaining prejudice prejudice-prong reasonable-probability right-to-trial strickland-v-washington
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the district court's ruling, which implies that when a petitioner successfully proves that his counsel was ineffective, that petitioner must then show that the outcome of his trial would have resulted in an acquittal, conflicts with Jae Lee v. United States?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court's ruling, which implies that when a petitioner successfully proves that his counsel was ineffective, that petitioner must then show that the outcome of his trial would have resulted in an acquittal, conflicts with Jae Lee v. United States?
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 10, 2019)
Attorneys
Garron T. Briggs
Garron T. Briggs — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent