WHETHER THE OFFICERS HAD REASONABLE SUSPICION TO SEIZE MR. BOOKER SHABAZZALLAH?

WHETHER THE OFFICERS HAD PROBABLE CAUSE TO CONVERT SEIZURE INTO AN ARREST OF MR. BOOKER SHABAZZALLAH AND TRANSPORT HIM TO THE POLICE STATION FOR MURDER INVESTIGATIVE DETENTION?

WHETHER THE COURTS IMPROPERLY, WEIGHED EVIDENCE AND RESOLVED DISPUTED ISSUES IN FAVOR OF MOVING PARTY IN HOLDING THAT POLICE OFFICERS ACTIONS DID NOT VIOLATE CLEARLY ESTABLISHED LAW?

WHETHER MR. BOOKER SHABAZZALLAH STATED A 42 U.S. -C.§ 1983CLAIM UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AGAINST DETECTIVE LUCK AND DETECTIVE KEOUGH?

WHETHER DETECTIVE LUCK"S AND SGT. JOHNSON"S STATEMENT WERE ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DISPOSITION IN CONFLICT WITH SARTOR V ARKANSAS NATURAL GAS CORP. 321 U.S. 620 (1944)?

WHETHER AN UNSWORN STATEMENT OF A DEFENDANT IN A 198 3COMPLAINT ATTACHED AS AN EXHIBIT TO PLAINTIFFS PLEADING TO SUPPORT THE PLAINTIFF'S ALLEGATION UNDER FED. R.C.P. 10(c) ,THAT THE OFFICER MADE THE STATEMENT, BUT NOT THE TRUTH OF THE STATFMENT,BE USED BY THE COURT SUA SPONTE TO DISMISS 'A CLAIM AND/OR ESTABLISH REASONABLE SUSPICION UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT?

Whether the officers had reasonable suspicion to seize Mr. Booker Shabazzallah?