1.
WHETHER ZEBADIAH HOLLAND IS ENTITLED TO NEW TRIAL BASED ON
NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE THAT NOT ONLY COMPLETELY
EXONERATES HIM, BUT ALSO SPECIFICALLY IMPLICATES THE REAL
PERPETRATORS?

2.
WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DENIED A FAIR TRIAL WHEN THE
PROSECUTOR COMMITTED A BRADY VIOLATION BY SUPPRESSING (A) A
WITNESS STATEMENT AND (B) THE HOMICIDE SCENE INVESTIGATOR
REPORT EVIDENCE WHICH WAS MATERIAL OR FAVORABLE TO THE
DEFENSE WHICH VIOLATED HIS FEDERAL AND STATE CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHT UNDER THE 14TH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS?

Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of standing and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted