No. 18-8368
Desmond Martin v. Mark Garman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al.
IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection jurisdiction standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Did the United States court of appeals err in denying relief when trial court unreasonably applied BATSON?
II. Was there sufficient evidence presented at trial to convict on all charges beyond a reasonable doubt?
III. Was trial counsel ineffective for failing to investigate ATM video, call an alibi witness, and order the DNA testing of exculpatory evidence?
IV. Did the prosecution withhold ATM video?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant legal principles
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-02-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 10, 2019)
Attorneys
Desmond Martin
Desmond Martin — Petitioner