No. 18-8365

Derrick Scott v. Allen Stark, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights court-filing due-process imminent-danger in-forma-pauperis prisoner-rights standing three-strikes
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the middle district Court and FifthCircuit court of apPeals in Conflict with Congress Plain. and Unambiguaus.mandatery
lansudse meaning of its excettion to Statute-d8 U.9.6.59.3 415
three --Strikes * Provision rule.

Whether the middie district Court cand Fifth Grcuit court of aPPe ale evred to refuse to allowed me. to Proceed: IFP as. ot indiaent Prase Prisoner because i did not have the money to Paythe
full court fee and. the. Full GPPeal fe.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the middle district Court and Fifth Circuit court of appeals erred in refusing to allow the petitioner to proceed IFP as an indigent prose prisoner because he did not have the money to pay the full court fee and the full appeal fee

Docket Entries

2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-11
Waiver of right of respondents Allen Stark, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 10, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisAppendixPetitionProof of Service

Attorneys

Allen Stark, et al.
Jonathan R. Vining — Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Respondent
Derrick Scott
Derrick Scott — Petitioner