No. 18-8347
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conflict constitutional-rights federal-courts federal-courts-conflict federal-jurisdiction fex-v-michigan florida-law interstate-agreement-on-detainers-act interstate-detainers judicial-review jurisdiction speedy-trial state-court-determination
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE STATE OF FLORIDA VIOLATED PETITIONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL INVOKED BY PETITIONER PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 3(a) OF THE INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS ACT (IADA)?
WHETHER THE STATE COURT'S DETERMINATION OF THE FACTS UNREASONABLE, WHERE THE FACTS OF PETITIONER'S CASE WERE IDENTICAL TO OTHER DEFENDANTS WHO WERE GRANTED RELIEF PURSUANT TO THIS COURT'S HOLDING IN FEX v. MICHIGAN.
WHETHER THIS COURT SHOULD ACCEPT JURISDICTION TO RESOLVE THE CONFLICT IN THE FEDERAL COURTS REGARDING THE ISSUE PRESENTED IN QUESTION ONE HEREIN.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state of Florida violated petitioner's constitutional right to a speedy trial
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-21
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2019-01-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 8, 2019)
Attorneys
Florida
Rebecca Rock McGuigan — Office of Florida Attorney General, Respondent
Jason Allen Tiszai
Jason Allen Tiszai — Petitioner