DID THE LOWER COUETS AUD JUDGES
VIOLATE APPELANT RISHT TOBE PRCES??
BOTH THE LOWE DISTRICT AUD CeCUT COUETS INOUTOUALLY MECGRED
PELAT'S BIVEUS - TYPE, CINL RiGHTS LAWGUT. THE COUEr REVIEN
MISRILED
EUBANC
11
OURT
By SUMMARILY STRIPPIG APPELLANT OF HIS STAUDNG TO SUE"
DEFENDANT ON THE ERROUEOUS GRONDS THAT HIS PERSOUAL ALLESATIOUS OF
CIVIL RIGHTS IRREPARABLE HARM AMOUNTS TO NOTHIUG MORE THAUA
GEUERALIZED GRIEVANCE". THE SUPRENE COUT' LAUOMAEK RULINGI
BINENS V6. SiX UIDETIFIED FEDERAL AGEUTS, 4O3 U.S. 388, 91S.C. 199,
2d LED 2d 619 WAS IMPROpERLY
OVERRLLED By THE LOWER COUETS' WROUGTU
LUTAN Vs. DETENDERS OF WILD LIFE, SO4 US. 555, S6O-6I 1990.
AUD
THE CEUTRAL QUESTIOS PEEENTED FOR REVIEN IS WHETHER OR NOT THE
COWRT CABE SUA SPOUTE
DEUIED OR STRIpED By THE LOWER COUer
IMPERMISSIBLE AD ERROUEONS FACT-FUDING THAT A CONSTITINTIONAL CLAIM
W TH S LA:
JUIDCAL VICTIMIZATO D HIM A IMPETAL AD FA COSIDERATION? :
ALI-APPONTED DETEUANT ApPONTE JUDE A "BU ALIO DEFEUDANT
COUSPIRE TO VIOLATE APPELLANT' CIVIL A COUSTITUTIONAL RIGHITS?
LONER COUeT JUDE AMIT MEHTA SIT As LANFILLY COSTITNTED AND
LEAL PRESDING O WAS HIS OFFICE VOD AB INITIO AND NOLLIFIED
A A ALE AND FOREGN APONTED JUGE AD
DESMISSAL WITH PEEUDICE VIOLATE BNGNS AUDS COSTITUTE A FATAL ERROE?

Whether the lower courts erred in violating Appellant's right to the free exercise of religion