No. 18-8323
Bryan Frederick Jennings v. Florida
IFP
Tags: capital-punishment capital-sentencing death-penalty death-penalty-review eighth-amendment fourteenth-amendment hurst-v-state jury-recommendation newly-discovered-evidence
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment Immigration
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments require
the law of Hurst v. State to be factored into the analysis of
the likelihood of a less severe sentence at a new penalty phase
at which the newly discovered evidence is introduced?
2. Whether the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments require
the law of Hurst v. Florida to be factored into the analysis of
the likelihood of a less severe sentence at a new penalty phase
at which the newly di
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments require the law of Hurst v. State to be factored into the analysis of the likelihood of a less severe sentence at a new penalty phase at which the newly discovered evidence is introduced?
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-04
Brief of respondent State of Florida in opposition filed.
2019-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 8, 2019)
2019-01-03
Application (18A691) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until March 3, 2019.
2018-12-22
Application (18A691) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 2, 2019 to March 3, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Bryan Jennings
Martin J. McClain — CCRC-South, Petitioner
State of Florida
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent