I. Because of the unique nature of a cell phone, the intrusion into the owner of the device will be ong oing as long as the device has the ability to be powered. Therefore, if a magistrate judg e has placed a time limitation on the Government's ability to ex tract information from the device, does the failure of the ex traction to be performed within the permissible framework of the warrant require the suppression of the tardily obtained information?

II. Because the rig ht to serve on a jury is that of the prospective juror, once a defendant has challeng ed the Government's use of a peremptory challeng e on a prospective juror who was African-American without providing an adequate race neutral basis for the challeng e, does the defendant need to renew the objection after the basis is provided to preserve appellate review of that challeng e?

Whether the failure to extract information from a cell phone within the time limitation of a warrant requires suppression of the tardily obtained information