No. 18-8298

Jermaine Brazill v. Illinois

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2019-03-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: age-of-offender cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process due-process-rights eighth-amendment independent-inquiry juvenile-sentencing life-without-parole mental-health rehabilitation rehabilitative-potential young-age
Latest Conference: 2019-03-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

Was it a violation of due process for the trial judge to rely purely on an opinion conducting any independent inquiry into the Petitioner's fitness.

Is it cruel and unusual punishment to sentence a 19-year old to an excessive 50 year de facto life sentence, where the Petitioner struggles with depression, has expressed his remorse, has strong family ties, and has great rehabilitative potential given his young age?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the trial judge violated the Petitioner's due process rights by failing to conduct an independent inquiry into the Petitioner's fitness, and whether the imposition of a life sentence on a 17-year-old with depression and rehabilitative potential constitutes cruel and unusual punishment

Docket Entries

2019-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2019-03-07
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2019-02-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2019)

Attorneys

Illinois
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Jermaine Brazill
Jermaine Brazill — Petitioner