No. 18-8284
Matthew Winters v. City of West Jordan, Utah, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment appeal-restrictions appeals constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection jurisdiction jurisdictional-bars pro-se standing
Latest Conference:
2019-04-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does it violate the Equal Protection and Due Process clauses of the 14 Amendment for pro se parties to have less time and more restrictions to file appeals?
Do jurisdiction-limiting rules not based on statute violate standing opinions of this Court (such as in Hamer, 2017) in light of the foregoing?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does it violate the Equal Protection and Due Process clauses of the 14th Amendment for pro se parties to have less time and more restrictions to file appeals?
Docket Entries
2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-04-01
Waiver of right of respondent Utah State Records Committee to respond filed.
2019-03-22
Waiver of right of respondent City of West Jordan to respond filed.
2019-03-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 4, 2019)
2019-01-02
Application (18A687) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until March 1, 2019.
2018-12-21
Application (18A687) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 31, 2018 to March 1, 2019, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
City of West Jordan
David M. Quealy — West Jordan City Attorney Office, Respondent
Matthew Winters
Matthew Winters — Petitioner
Utah State Records Committee
Stanford Edward Purser — Utah Attorney General's Office, Respondent