No. 18-8260
Kenton Deon Harrell v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claim criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection evidentiary-hearing free-speech habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance post-conviction-relief standing statutory-interpretation takings
Latest Conference:
2019-03-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
This Court's holding and 28 U.S.C. § 2255(b) require a § 2255 court to conduct an evidentiary hearing unless the record and filings conclusively prove that the move is not entitled to relief. Mr. Harrell alleged that his attorney's out-of-control-statements allegations entitle Mr. Harrell to an evidentiary hearing rather than summary disposition?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant legal principles
Docket Entries
2019-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2019-03-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 3, 2019)
2018-12-31
Application (18A676) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until February 25, 2019.
2018-12-15
Application (18A676) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 31, 2018 to February 25, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Kenton Deon Harrell
Kenton Deon Harrell — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent