1. WHETHER PETITIONER'S 5th AND 14th AMEND. U.S. CONST. RIGHTS AND U.S. FEDERAL LAW AS SET FORTH BY U.S. SUPREME COURT PRECEDENCE BE IMMEDIATELY DISCHARGED WHEN AN OHIO CREATED STATE LAW WHICH AFFORDS PETITIONER PROTECTED LIBERTY INTEREST IS VIOLATED BY THE STATE CAUSING A CONTINUING INJURY TO PETITIONER'S PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS RIGHTS?

2. DOES A STATE COURT'S VIOLATION OF U.S. SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION, PROTECTED LIBERTY INTEREST DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW?

3. DID DEFENSE COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE, FILE, AND LITIGATE A MOTION TO DISMISS AT PETITIONER'S REQUEST DUE TO PRE-TRIAL FAST AND SPEEDY TRIAL VIOLATION PURSUANT OHIO LAW, WHICH MERITORIOUS, SHOW DEFICIENT PERFORMANCE, AND PREJUDICE U.S. 5th, 6th, AND 14th AMEND. U.S. CONST. RIGHTS?

Whether a petitioner who remains in custody in violation of his 5th and 14th Amendment rights must be immediately discharged without regard to state law which affords the petitioner a protected liberty interest