No. 18-8231
Alvin Stanley Briggs, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-review counsel-claim court-of-appeals criminal-procedure district-court due-process evidentiary-hearing habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
WIETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN AFFIRMING THE
DISTRICT COURT'S DENIAL OF PETITIONER'S INEFFECTIVE
ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL C LAIM.
WHETHER THE DISTRCITCOURT ERRED IN NOT CONDUCTING, AN
EVIDENTIARY HEARING.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals erred in affirming the district court's denial of petitioner's ineffective assistance of counsel claim
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 1, 2019)
2018-09-26
Application (18A319) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until December 5, 2018.
2018-08-14
Application (18A319) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 21, 2018 to December 5, 2018, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Alvin Stanley Briggs
Alvin Stanley Briggs Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent