No. 18-8228

Daryl Bocook v. Gary Mohr, Warden

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2019-03-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process federal-courts federal-jurisdiction federal-precedent forensic-evidence habeas-corpus jurisdiction jurisdictional-conflict legal-principles precedent-conflict standing state-court-dismissal supreme-court-review
Latest Conference: 2019-04-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

The state courts sua sponte dismissal of my petition was A departure from the Accepted And usual course of Judicial proceedings including claims of Extrinsic fraud colul modes of procedures snd lack of subject matter Jurisdiction that

The state courts sun sponte dismissal of my petition is in direct conflict with other precedents on similar legal principles, As well as federal controlling precedents on the same legal principles. The state courts decision disregards

The state courts sua sponte dismissal of my petition is in direct conflict with relevant decisions of this court and has neglected to adjudicate upon an important federal question of law.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the state courts' sua sponte dismissal of the petition is in direct conflict with other precedents on standing legal issues as well as federal controlling precedents on the same issues

Docket Entries

2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2018-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 1, 2019)

Attorneys

Daryl Bocook
Daryl Bocook — Petitioner